Michael Jackson Idol

(Carrying on from before), how would THESE Pro Wrestlers do in MMA?

As we know, Batista will be making his debut for Strikeforce soon and we also know that many great MMA have come from wrestling e.g. Tank Abbott,Bobby Lashley,Ken Shamrock,Kazushi Sakuraba and of course, Brock Lesnar.

How would these pro wrestlers do (new names added to list)? Do you agree with what I think?

NEW:

Ric Flair (I doubt him from the off/IDHFTO)
Ultimate Warrior
Macho Man (IDHFTO)
Jake ‘The Snake’ Roberts (he invented the DDT,looks freakishly strong/scary)
Tommy Dreamer (he’s been seen wearing MMA gloves regularly)
Drew McIntyre (IDKFTO)
Sheamus (big,strong and an ginger Irishman-plus he was a bouncer-I assume that means he’s had plenty of brawling experience with the drunkards)

Skip Sheffield
Michael Tarver
Wade Barrett
^^^All 3of the NXT guys look extremely big and strong

No notable legit skills:

John Cena- pound for pound he’s strong as f*ck-he powerlifts over 500 on all lifts and can lift Big Show/Mark Henry on his shoulders-functional strength.
Randy Orton-tall,fit,young
The Rock-does lots of high-rep training but can lift over 400lbs on powerlifts. Used to be a football player.
Razor Ramon-badass
Kevin ‘Big Sexy’ Nash-big
Lex Luger-big
Triple H- He can Pedigree his opponents and is a pretty badass guy. Pedigree could work if you knee them hard enough to stun them
Ezekiel Jackson-big badass
Edge-young,atheltic,could Spear them into the cage wall
Mike Knox-scares the crap outta me!
Abyss-see above
Rey Mysterio-Lucha Libre/ high plyometic strength
Stone Cold Steve Austin- Big and strong
Booker T- Beat up Batista so it means something
R Truth-Reminds me of Booker T
Great Khali- Strong as hell,has good reach, knows kabidi (Indian wrestling) I think
Shawn Michaels- Heart,Sweet Chin Music, Leg Lock, Flying Elbow Drop off of cage wall
John Morrison-Plyometric strength-see HBK (IDHFTO)

Legit Skills:

Bret Hart-did amateur wrestling at College. Could put the opponent into a sharpshooter (like MMA leg lock)
Hulk Hogan- did amateur wrestling before Pro. Bodyslammed Andre the giant
Rob Van Damme-Martial arts training/flexibility
C.M Punk-Muay Thai
Samoa Joe-MMA Training atm/was State Judo Champ/did American Football
Goldberg-Enthusiastic about it/trains in it/played American Football
Undertaker-trains in MMA but his main thing is BJJ. Actually,what colour belt is he in BJJ?Strong.
Kane-has legit wrestling skills I hear. Strong.
Koslov-knows Sambo/won MMA fight when younger. Played American football
Chris Jericho-once outwrestled Goldberg in proper wrestling
Jack Swagger/William Regal/Shelton Benjamin-won national wrestling competitions. I doubt their chances for some reason
Shad Gaspard-was a pretty good amateur boxer
Brian Danielson (NXT/team WWE)-trains in MMA
I forgot to add the main person

KURT ANGLE-GOLD MEDALLIST!

Comments (4)

David Wild: "Redemption Song": My Post-Emmy Playlist For George Clooney

Moments before he accepted the Television Academy’s Bob Hope Humanitarian Award from his lovely friend and former hospital co-worker Julianna Margulies last night at the 62nd Primetime Emmy Awards, George Clooney proved once and for all what a truly great humanitarian he is. Mr. Clooney did so by taking time off from saving the world and sleeping with the cast of Modern Family to personally tell me that he “really enjoys those Huffington Post playlists you do.” Accordingly, I now demand that we give this saint his own very special Nobel Peace Prize for Playlist Appreciation.

Seriously, it’s been a profound — for me — honor to work alongside George, Joel Gallen and many other volunteers on America: A Tribute To Heroes and subsequent TV events like most recently, the Hope For Haiti Now telethon. I feel privileged to have witnessed up close just how genuinely dedicated this man really is to the refreshing and even honorable idea that people do something meaningful with the very mixed bag that is modern fame.

In his acceptance speech last night, Clooney spoke of the time he spent years ago with Bob and Dolores Hope and his aunt, the late great Rosemary Clooney, who I once had the pleasure of interviewing in her later years for Vogue magazine. Back then, Rosemary sweetly told me “George is a very nice boy.” She also told me that I “would have gotten along famously with Ira,” referring to her longtime neighbor Ira Gershwin.” Curiously, that’s still probably the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me. Let it be said, Rosemary Clooney was one fantastic lady.

Last night, Rosemary’s hunky/heroic nephew rather elegantly referred back to his time spent singing and talking with the Hopes and his wonderful aunt, pointing out that “They’re the best version of the term `celebrity.’” George Clooney went on to say, “It’s important to remember how much good can get done because we live in such strange times where bad behavior soaks up all the attention and press, and the people who really need the spotlight — the Haitians, the Sudanese, people in the Gulf Coast on the 5-year Anniversary, people in Pakistan, they can’t get any.” I was reminded of something Bob Hope said long ago that still applies: “If you haven’t any charity in your heart, you have the worst kind of heart trouble.”

Finally, George ended his comments by making a point worth re-running here — words that to my ears sounded almost like a prayer for redemption from deep within our modern celebrity food chain: “Here’s hoping that some very bright person right here in the house — or at home watching — can help find a way to keep the spotlight burning on these heartbreaking situations that continue to be heartbreaking long after the cameras go away,” he said. “That would be an impressive accomplishment.”

Sadly, I’m not bright. So now along with his richly deserved Bob Hope Humanitarian Award, it is my great honor by the nominal power invested in me by this blog, to present George Clooney with his very own uplifted Huffington Post playlist. As always, please add your own redemption songs here for George — and for the rest of humanity too.

REDEMPTION SONG – Bob Marley & The Wailers
CRUMBS FROM YOUR TABLE – U2
HELP – The Beatles
PEOPLE GET READY – The Impressions
LORD PROTECT MY CHILD – Bob Dylan
LEND A HAND – Jakob Dylan
GOD BLESS THE CHILD – Rosemary Clooney
LUCKY US – Bob Hope with Margaret Whiting
HIGH HOPES – Frank Sinatra
HOW CAN YOU MEND A BROKEN HEART – Al Green
HOW CAN A POOR MAN STAND SUCH TIMES AND LIVE – Bruce Springsteen
LEAN ON ME – Bill Withers
SOMEDAY WE’LL ALL BE FREE – Alicia Keys
HEAVEN HELP US ALL – Stevie Wonder
HELPING HAND – Fats Domino
WHO’S GONNA HELP BROTHER GET FURTHER – Elvis Costello & Allen Toussaint
LORD HELP US – Tom Jones
HELP SOMEBODY – Maxwell
I CAN HELP – Elvis Presley
EVERYBODY HURTS – R.E.M.
WELCOME TO THE FUTURE – Brad Paisley
WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS – Joe Cocker
SOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME – Brian Wilson
MAN IN THE MIRROR – Michael Jackson
HELP ME MAKE IT THROUGH THE NIGHT – Kris Kristofferson
WHAT’S GOING ON – Marvin Gaye
DON’T GIVE UP – Peter Gabriel with Kate Bush

Read more: Michael Jackson, Brian Wilson, Peter Gabriel, Tom Jones, Julianna Margulies, Ira Gershwin, Sudanese, Fats Domino, U2, Kate Bush, Joe Cocker, The Beatles, Stevie Wonder, Maxwell, Rosemary Clooney, Elvis Costello, Bob Marley, Pakistan, Kris Kristofferson, Katrina Anniversary, George Clooney, The Impressions, Bob Dylan, Haitians, Emmy Awards, Elvis Presley, Margaret Whiting, Bill Withers, Al Green, Jakob Dylan, Alicia Keys, Frank Sinatra, R.E.M., Brad Paisley, Gulf Coast, Allen Toussaint, Bruce Springsteen, Marvin Gaye, Entertainment News

Comments (0)

Michael Jackson’s Kids Paris & Prince Michael Enroll At The Buckley School

Two of Michael Jackson’s kids have taken a big step — leaving homeschool for one of the most exclusive private schools in the country.

TMZ has learned 13-year-old Prince and 12-year-old Paris started at The Buckley School in the San Fernando Valley on Wednesday.

Read more: Michael Jackson, Prince Michael Paris Jackson, The Buckley School, Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, Celebrity Kids, Prince Michael Jackson, Prince Michael Paris Jackson School, Entertainment News

Comments (0)

Jeanine Celeste Pang: David LaChapelle: "I Would Rather Die Than Be a Serious Artist, or a Fake Artist"

A conversation with 47-year-old photographer David LaChapelle cleaves to the surreal, gratuitous, and subversive–much like a reflection of his work. But underneath the perennial trucker hat, there lies the tenderness and charm of a boy struggling to gain footing. Below, his angles on shock and success.

Jeanine Celeste Pang: You are both a photographer and a director. Which do you prefer, photographs or film?

David LaChapelle: I’m a photographer, period. I love photography, the immediacy of it. I like the craft, the idea of saying “I’m a photographer.” It can be as big as you want it to be; reality is in the eye of the beholder.

JCP: Your work has been described as entertainment slapped with shock value. Thoughts?

DLC: I would rather die than be a serious artist, or a fake artist. I give you Naomi Campbell in high heels and makeup, and she’s representing Africa. If you want to hate it, hate it. But I’ve never tried to take a shocking picture. I just want to grab your attention. We’re all on twitter and cell phones. I want to grab your attention through color and beauty. But we are in an unshockable society.

JCP: You’ve learned from some iconic photographers, including Andy Warhol. What’s the best advice received?

DLC: Do whatever you want, just make everyone look good. For me, it’s easier to like more things than to dislike them; I’m not a critic in that sense. I find it easier to like more, to be more open and enjoy more things, which has given me more opportunities. The best thing I learned from Andy Warhol wasn’t what he said. It was being with him in the last few years of his life and observing. The critics would write horrible things about him. You don’t need to listen to people. You know who your true fans are — you just feel it, you see it in their faces, or they’ll write you letters. There’s a lot of hate, but there’s also a lot of love.

JCP: Define success.

DLC: Success to me is being a good person, treating people well. But, I’m a work in progress. I have my devils and demons. I’ve had the issue where you cheat the ones you love. I would lose my temper and things like that. It kills me, I always suffer from that because you can never take that back. It’s easy to be kind, but it’s also easy to be cruel. Hopefully I’ve grown up a little bit. But I’m not going to pretend to be someone I’m not. There are times when I’m going to fucking party, and I’m going to be true to myself.

JCP: Do you have a mantra?

DLC: Don’t judge people. Everyone had a judgment about Michael Jackson, but I think Michael was a messenger and he was here to teach us. He was a friend of mine. When he was charged with pedophilia, he still lived his life with such dignity. Even when he was under the most horrible of times, he never lost it, he never freaked out. He just lived it out with dignity, and kindness, and talent.

JCP: You’ve shot a promo trailer for Lost. Name five people you’d want to be marooned on an island with.

DLC: I would want Michael Jackson because I love him. Walt Whitman because he’s my favorite writer and poet, and he can read us poetry. We would also have spiritual guidance from him. Also, Amy Sedaris because she could make us laugh and she could cook. The fourth would be Abraham Lincoln; he could build a log cabin if we needed it and he could sort of govern everyone. I would like Abraham Lincoln to choose the last person, so I’ll give him a plus one. With the exception of Mary Todd Lincoln.

JCP: If you could come back as anything else, what would you be?

DLC: A soul singer, someone who sings from the heart. Like Bette Midler, like Lady Gaga, like Mary J Blige. Or Alice Ridley. Yes, I want to come back as Alice Ridley, and I’d want my daughter to be Precious. I guess I’d want to come back as a black woman singer.

JCP: And your legacy in this lifetime?

DLC: That I tried my best.

LaChapelle’s solo exhibition “American Jesus” is currently on view through September 18, 2010 at Paul Kasmin Gallery, NYC.

Read more: New York Art Galleries, Photography, Fashion Photography, David Lachapelle, Art Galleries, Michael Jackson, Arts News

Comments (0)

Is Off The Wall one of Michael Jacksons best albums?

i think it is

where are all the mj fans? and the posers like Debbie and Gavin?

Comments (21)

Why did Obama have an "off the record" lunch with the media…what does he have to hide?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100813/pl_yblog_upshot/which-white-house-reporters-had-lunch-with-obama
Reporters wouldn’t say Thursday who joined President Obama for an off-the-record lunch at the White House.

The Upshot noted the irony that news organizations have been at the forefront of the fight to make White House visitor logs public. Not to mention the fact that the names of those who visit the White House in August will be made available to the public by November anyway.

But who wants to wait until November? The Upshot has now learned which White House beat reporters attended the off-the-record meeting.

Here’s the lineup: Ben Feller (Associated Press), Jonathan Weisman and Laura Meckler (Wall Street Journal), Michael Shear and Scott Wilson (Washington Post), Caren Bohan (Reuters), David Jackson (USA Today), Carol Lee (Politico), Peter Nicholas (Tribune Co.), Margaret Talev (McClatchy) and Julianna Goldman (Bloomberg).

Several reporters on this list gave "no comments" to The Upshot on Thursday.

The New York Times was invited but did not attend. White House reporter Peter Baker told The Upshot that the paper "politely declined because we’d like very much to talk on the record."

Comments (11)

Poll for MJ fans: What picture do you think Michael looked his best out of the following 5?

1. http://i718.photobucket.com/albums/ww187/ruby_yuson/Michael%20Jackson%20This%20Is%20It%20Rehearsals%20pictures/michael167.jpg

2. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz17/pinkkisses2uMJ/Dangerous%20era/004.jpg

3. http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af268/iLoveMJ141/MJ79-1.jpg

4. http://blogs.larioja.com/blogfiles/videos-favoritos/Michael_Jackson-Off_The_Wall-Frontal.jpg

5. http://www.mmjworld.de/galerie/michael/thriller/83_00_00_thriller/images/83_00_00_thriller_52.jpg

Comments (22)

Tom Doctoroff: How China Feels About America: Dangerous Love

Most Americans, only marginally less ethnocentric today than twenty years ago, have a simplistic, nuance-free view of China and the Chinese people. Although apprehensive about the rise of an economic juggernaut and its impact on the American way of life, their view of the Middle Kingdom remains locked post-Tiananmen imagery. My own twin brother – by American standards, an educated, intellectually-curious guy — still perceives China as “dusty,” “robotic,” “grey” and ultra-conformist.

The Chinese, on the other hand, are fascinated by America, often perplexed by our society’s inherent contradictions. The United States is free and unfair, creative and fashion-challenged (some describe blue button-down shirts and khaki pants as our “uniform”), sporty (NBA rules!) and grossly overweight, individualistic and self-deluded (they love to laugh at narcissistic, talent-free American Idol contestants). They are amazed a nation of 300 million self-starters does not come apart at the seams.

Deep Ambivalence

Actually, the Chinese are more than perplexed by America; they are deeply ambivalent. On a personal level, they admire – are even intoxicated by – U.S.-style individualism. At the same time, they regard it as “dangerous,” both personally and as a national competitive advantage.

In 1999, when America bombed the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia, the nation erupted with rage, but it was the fury of betrayal, disorientation and stunned rejection. No one chanted, “America is evil.” Instead, there were tears of disillusionment. The United States, then widely perceived as a land of endless opportunity and noble ideals, was exposed as “just another country” in which the “powerful protect their interests at all cost.” I had been in the PRC for a year, always greeted with openness, curiosity and warm facial expressions. When the news of my country’s misdeed swept the airwaves, the lights went out. No one’s eyes met mine. They wondered whether I, too, was a fraud, a commercial hack intent on profiting from the Mainland at the expense of the Mainland. After a week, however, tempers cooled but a scar of regretful suspicion has since marred the cultural landscape.

Deep Affection

Evidence of deep affection – and inspiration by – the American way of life is everywhere. Illegal DVDs of American movies and television shows sell like hotcakes. Archetypical TV fare — “Friends, “Prison Break,” “Sex in the City,” “Desperate Housewives” and, more recently, “The Big Bang Theory” — celebrate a quintessentially American fusion of community and individual idiosyncrasy. They are beloved, downloaded as soon as new episodes air in the States. The election President Obama, a black man with no dynastic credentials, is regarded with awe, a tribute to genuine egalitarianism. Apple-mania is sweeping the nation, at least in first-tier cities. Every Mainland conglomerate wants to become “GE of China.” Furthermore, our “capitalistic heroes,” from Bill Gates to Warren Buffet, are role models of the highest order, respected for personal vision and achieving master-of-the-universe status. Amongst denizens of rural China, less worldly than their cousins in glittering coastal capitals, America is not only esteemed for its “freedom”; it is also described transcendently as “a land of dreams” and “golden horizon.”

American Individualism and Me.
China’s admiration of the American can-do spirit springs, ironically, from its Confucian heritage. Their value system is a quixotic combination of regimentation and ambition. Regarding the former, the individual is not considered the basic building block of productivity. This has always been, and continues to be, the clan. Human “rights” are either a theoretical abstraction or, even in good times, luxuries to be sacrificed on the Altar of Pragmatism. But Confucianism has always espoused social mobility. By mastering convention, Chinese have been able to, at least hypothetically, climb the hierarchy, the shape and structure of which is societally mandated. (Today, the acquisition of wealth defines the ultimate definition of success, not as a “right” but, rather, the most valuable contribution to China’s rise as an economic superpower.)

Yes, in China, Confucian egos are huge so American-style self-expression is all the rage. Brands that celebrate “me” – from Nike’s “Just Do It” spirit to Apple’s “Think Different” rallying cry – are embraced, particularly by the young urban elite. American universities, manufacturers of Golden Tickets of success, have lost none of their appeal. T-shirts sporting the latest hip hop slang are all the rage and pop cultural divas who bow to no one — Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Madonna and, in perpetuity, Michael Jackson – are revered are modern-day Gods of Self-Actualization. Sporting figures such as brash Kobe Bryant and even turncoat LeBron James are idolized infinitely more than their Chinese brethren. Yao Ming, for example, once revered for his on-court exploits is now referred to as “Boss Yao,” a respectful but emotionally disengaged acknowledgement that the star-cum-businessman been folded back into the system.

Tempting but Forbidden. On the other hand, American icons, while adored, are rarely emulated. Rebellion – i.e., challenging the system — is a red line few dare cross. Tattoos are always discreetly placed on the ankle or shoulder. Dye jobs are never over the top, with colors ranging from red to blond and sometimes Japan-cool grey. Women flaunting sexuality, in dress or attitude, are never taken home to mom and dad. Even the most opinionated employees rarely muster enough courage to overtly challenge the boss. American individualism is, in short, forbidden fruit, dangerously tempting. Taking a bite is tantamount to a one-way ticket to the Land of Outcasts.

The Chinese remain intoxicated by the allure of genuine American self-expression but frustrated by its ultimate impossibility. As a result, attitudes towards our nation, and its character, are mixed, sometimes dreamy-eyed and sometimes derisive. Many snicker at our naïveté; others scoff at our braggadocio. George W. Bush was often compared to a chimpanzee.

National Insecurity, National Suspicion

Chinese ambivalence towards the United States will only grow as the former assumes its rightful place as a modern superpower, Herculean in ambition but still brittle, politically and economically. As China confronts the challenges of sustainable growth, more people in the Middle Kingdom grasp the link – intellectually, at least — between American freedoms and its innovative spirit, between the right to challenge convention and high industrial productivity. Specifically, American freedom is underpinned by impartial institutions that protect individual interests. From an independent judiciary and wide availability of credit to self-correcting representative elections and a robust constitution framework structured around checks and balances, the United States is a society balanced by rule of law. We are crazy kids bouncing around rubber rooms with padded walls. The Chinese tip-toe through a crystal palace, always in danger of shattering. They nervously abide by an intricate code of mutual obligations that keeps society from unraveling.

Chinese Cycles vs. American Reinvention. Instinctively and intellectually, China knows limits on self-expression manifest themselves at the national level. It knows double digit growth will not be sustainable if some sort of political reform – institutional responsiveness to society’s fault lines – is not implemented within the next ten years. It knows its stock exchanges are closer to Macanese gambling parlors than temples of efficient capital allocation. It knows its courts are subordinate to the Party’s, not the People’s, interests. It knows the roadmap needs to be redrawn. Institutions require modernization.

But how? No leader has articulated a clear path forward, and this is scary. America, and the political and economic systems that underpin it, is a mirage, not a destination. Vast cultural chasms exist between the United States and China. The American “model,” rooted in civil liberties, born of Greek rationalism and monotheistic self-determination, provides no blueprint for the future.

Yet the subject of political reform is largely taboo, except in the pages of rarified intellectual journals. Fortunately, the China people have faith in the wisdom of their central government leaders, confidence in their ability to “cross the river by feeling the stones,” belief that that empowered leaders will – somehow, someway – outline a series of incremental reforms that transform the PRC into a modern state. Unfortunately, however, faith is beginning to wear thin; uncertainty expresses itself as anxiety on the most personal level. Real estate prices are sky-rocketing, more than twenty times per capita income. The supply of well-paying entry-level jobs remains vastly smaller than the number of new college graduates. China’s Balkanized industrial chain is unable to ensure the safety of dairy and toy products. And provincial level corruption of officialdom is now endemic, self-evident. In short, life is increasingly stressful. More and more wonder how they will make ends meet for their families. The Chinese are optimistic in the adaptive strength of the people and nation. But their optimism is not absolute.

In this context, American resilience is a source of fear. True, our recent economic setbacks and political immobilization has released a tidal wave of Schadenfreude. However, in their hearts, they believe our system, built to last, is superior to theirs. As one client, an employee of a large state-owned enterprise, said to me, “America was born to be reborn. We exist in a cycle, one destined to repeat itself every few hundred years. “

America the Hegemon? The United State’s capacity for reinvention is threatening, all the more so because, in Han eyes, the powerful – lao da — are bent on maintaining their advantage at the expense of the weak. And the people, while celebrating their nation’s rise to the world’s second largest economy, are clear-eyed about challenges. “China has a large population, a weak economic foundation, relatively few resources and a large poverty population, which remains our basic situation,” Ma Jiantang, head of China’s statistics bureau, said in January. “Therefore, while we take note of our expanding size of economy and enhancing economic strength, we should also have a sober understanding that China remains a developing nation.”

Given an acute aware of their system’s limitations, the Chinese are hypersensitive to any perceived assault on China’s sovereignty. Nationalistic prickliness abounds. When economic mandarins allowed the renminbi to rise against the dollar, cyberspace released a chorus of disgust. When a Chinese pilot was accidentally killed during the 2001 Hainan spy plane incident, most saw an American hegemonic plot to contain China. When the world protested the government’s heavy-handed suppression of minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang, the nation was unified in protest, piqued by outside interference in “internal” affairs. U.S. perennial weapons sales to Taiwan distresses ordinary Chinese at the deepest level; they represent a direct assault on national cohesion, the ultimate safeguard against chaos, the Maginot line protecting the Middle Kingdom from disintegration.

Frustrated Ambition, Nationalistic Repression. More subtly, attacks on national potential also threaten confidence in “my own greatness.” Chinese ego repression ensures that individual identities are linked to national pride, exacerbating the impact of American condescension, real or imagined. All strands of Chinese culture – Confucianism, Legalism, and Daoism – deemphasizes the individual. Yet both Confucianism and Deng Xiao Ping’s “to get rich is glorious” mandate put a premium on (state-endorsed) achievement. The vast majority of Chinese, particularly younger and wealthier ones, are caught between two mutually-exclusive goals: standing out and fitting in. Chinese ambition is restrained by convention. Individual identities are smothered, burdened by layers of suppressed expression. Brand China – i.e., nationalism — is seized en masse as the ultimate identity surrogate. The success of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, and increasing deference paid to China in the diplomatic arena, assuages, but does not eliminate, trenchant vulnerability.

Twenty-First Century Harmony?

Is all lost? Will China’s love-hate relationship with America result in perpetual conflict, an engrained win-lose approach to 21st century affairs? I don’t think so.

First, the Chinese, despite their insecurities, are eminently pragmatic. They realize our economies are inextricably intertwined. They know they are dependent on the American market and will remain so even after the remninbi’s inevitable appreciation. Furthermore, China, fiercely self-protective, paradoxically relies on Uncle Sam’s military might to maintain order in today’s multi-polar world.

Second, the vast majority of Americans are not “anti-China.” In our hearts, there remains a reservoir of admiration for the scale of Chinese ambition, not to mention respect for citizens’ individual drive. Our fascination with all things Han, emerging only now, is reflected by 100,000 young Americans who will study on the Mainland over the next few years.

China, a country that has been both intoxicated and repelled by America for over one hundred years, knows we have no choice but to build win-win platforms. For the sake of its children, and assuming implementation of a crash-resistant growth “paradigm,” China will continue to nervously embrace the United States as parallel universe of double-edged desire.

Read more: Michael Jackson, Desparate Housewives, Nationalism, The Big Bang Theory, Beijing Olympics, Warren Buffet, Chinese Identity, American Self-Expression, Kobe Bryant, Apple, Nike, Yugoslavian Chinese Embassy Bombing, Chinese Nationalism, Friends, Hainan Attack, Economic Reform in China, Geroge W. Bush, Microsoft, American Hegemony, Brand China, Madonna, Beyonce, Bill Gates, 21st Centure Confucianism, China and America, Prison Break, Ameican Idol, American Individualism, Deng Xiaoping, Self-Expression, Lady GaGa, China's Sustainability, LeBron James, World News

Comments (0)

Mike Ragogna: The Business of Music III: A Conversation with Razor & Tie’s Cliff Chenfeld and Craig Balsam

2010-08-16-razorandtie_logo.gif

A Conversation with Razor & Tie’s Cliff Chenfeld & Craig Balsam

Mike Ragogna: The label Razor & Tie has had an extremely successful run and is practically the model for what to do right as an indie label. That success has gone beyond merely music CDs as you’ve branched out into DVDs, publishing, distribution, etc. Can you go into the story of how Razor & Tie began?

2010-08-16-cliff.jpg
(photo credit: Dan Levine)

Cliff Chenfeld: Craig and I both had music backgrounds, working in record stores or being in bands. But then we both went off and became lawyers, and did legal work which really didn’t have much to do with music. We thought we were going to grow up and become partners at law firms, but after doing that for a couple of years, we realized we really didn’t enjoy practicing law as much as we enjoyed music. So, we began to think about ways we could maybe change our careers. We were getting into our late twenties and feeling that if we didn’t make a move soon, we’d have a lot less flexibility.

So, we toyed with a number of things, including writing songs together, and that didn’t really work. We then came upon this idea of putting out records from the seventies. This was in 1990, in a time when the seventies revival had not started in any way. The seventies were sort of a pariah decade at that point, and most of the music that was being sold on television was really sort of Slim Whitman or hits from the fifties. But we figured that our generation–who were becoming adults and responsible at that point–would probably be home more often, and more receptive to a television campaign, and starting to get nostalgic about the seventies. We also thought maybe some people who grew up in the seventies might start having some positions of power in pop culture and all of the sudden you might start seeing shows about it and movies about it.

2010-08-16-ThoseFabulous70s.jpg

Fortunately, it turned out that we were right in a certain way, so we put our first record out, The Fabulous Seventies, in 1990, and we did a commercial for it called The ’70s Preservation Society Presents: Those Fabulous ’70s, and it did well. It did really well, and off we went. We worked out of my apartment for the first two years or so, and then my wife got pregnant with our first son and we got a tiny little office down here on Sullivan street. Now, twenty years later, we have two-and-a-half floors of the building. That’s how it got started.

2010-08-16-craig.jpg
(photo credit: Dan Levine)

Craig Balsam: I met Cliff in law school sometime in the mid-eighties. We practiced law for a little while separately in New York City and decided that wasn’t for us. We wanted to start a company that was connected to our passion, which was music, and in 1990, we opened our doors. We did a compilation of songs from the nineteen seventies and many people bought it. We advertised it on TV, and somehow, that started a company that is still around twenty years later. Today, we still do a lot of TV marketing of compilations, but we have a full-fledged record label; we have a music publishing company; we have a music management company; we have a pretty big and successful children’s brand called Kidz Bop; and we’re still surviving in an economic atmosphere that is much harder to survive in than it was in the past. So, it’s very interesting to be in the music business these days.

MR: This eventually led to Razor & Tie’s releasing Rhino-like reissues and projects by new artists.

CC: Well, the first thing we did was compilation albums when we saw that there was a real opportunity to begin licensing titles. This was in the middle of the whole CD revolution, and there were lots of albums that major labels had decided they didn’t necessarily want to put out on CD. So, we did a significant amount of licensing of those albums and put, literally, hundreds of titles out. There was just this gap between the major labels feeling they needed to sell a ton of these to reissue them and us saying, “There are lots of strong niche markets.”

2010-08-16-517vSv3oDL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

We got everything from Bobby Womack to The Partridge Family, and from Arthur Alexander to Bobby Bare. I mean, we were in every genre, and we got stuff that sold a lot. We had tremendous success getting the rights to Michael Stanley’s music which, at the time, no one outside of Ohio had really thought about. But his music had never been available on CD and there was a big audience for it. So, we just had a great run on that, and that probably ran for us for about 12 years. That was a big part of our business.

As more and more titles were ultimately released or compiled on CD, that market became smaller and that part of our business became smaller, just a supply and demand thing. But it was great because we were allowed to get into a lot of music that we loved, and it was a business scale that worked very well for us. At the time, if we sold twenty thousand copies of something we could make that work, and sometimes, we’d sell one hundred or two hundred and we’d make that work.

Then, at some point, we said, “Let’s start putting some new music out,” and that first new music was basically music from more veteran artists who we were big fans of but who had gone out of their label deal. So, we always approached this relatively moderately, and we just decided that the thing we wanted to do was, “Let’s not start from scratch.” We made deals with Graham Parker and Marshall Crenshaw to put new music out from them, and simultaneously, we signed out first new artist, which was Dar Williams. That sort of started our new music initiative.

2010-08-16-51TrAIt6xrL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

MR: Dar Williams is one of the great success stories of Razor & Tie. How did you break her as an act?

CC: Well, Dar is incredibly talented. So as much as we did right with her, it’s ultimately about the artist, and she is an incredible songwriter, singer, and performer. But look, it was the mid-nineties and she was one of the first that tapped into a group of people who she communicated with directly via the Internet. She had sort of a built-in fan base and I think, working with her, we did a very good job of communicating with that fan base. At the same time, working with her, we struck a nice balance between trying to stay true to what her music was, and at the same time, pushing her to be a little bit more commercial and to do some things that she might not have done otherwise. So, we have had a great run with her.

Her first five records each sold more than one hundred thousand copies, she’s got a great touring career, and people have a great deal of respect for her. It’s something that we’re very proud of, in the sense that we were able to work with somebody who is that talented and really be able to help her in her career and, at the same time, maintain a really good relationship with her for fifteen years. She’s still on our label, and we’re coming out with a collection of new recordings and some of her classic songs on a two-disc set. We’re really excited about that.

MR: Wow, fifteen years. Will “February” be on the release?

CB: Yes. Dar’s the artist that has been with us the longest, and we’re going to finally put out–for lack of a better phrase–a Greatest Hits record with her in the Fall, and she is recording eight or nine of her better known songs, recording them again in an interesting way, doing some duets that’ll add to the release, so we’re excited about that with her.

MR: Will the duets be part of a bonus disc?

CB: It’ll be part of the release. We’re not quite sure how we’re going to configure it yet, but everyone who buys one will get these songs that have been newly-recorded by Dar.

MR: With the exception of through telemarketing, it seems that there’s nowhere to sell a ton of CDs anymore. However, there’s a strong market for CDs among certain demos, and it seems like we’re killing it off a bit prematurely, right?

CC: Look, there’s no question that more people are buying via digital than before, and more people are stealing than before. I mean, you can’t deny that. On the other hand, there are still a significant number of people who like to buy music on CD, who like to buy music physically. You can see that when Susan Boyle sold three million copies last year, you can see that with Michael Jackson, you can see that with Justin Bieber. People still buy a lot of CD’s.

I think there are a number of different factors that are causing that market to decline faster than consumer behavior would necessarily dictate such as the trouble record stores have had, and the fact that many of the companies involved need to demonstrate that they are thinking with a very forward perspective. To the extent that they’re pouring effort, time, and money into selling CDs, they look like they’re not focusing on the future. I think that there are different ways of doing this. You can absolutely be as forward looking as you need to be, but not leave a lot of money on the table, and that’s certainly what we’re trying to do. We have artists that sell ninety percent digital, and artists that sell ninety percent physical, and we want to be able to accommodate both of those.

The problem in the music business right now is that people are giving up on those folks that sell ninety percent physical. How can you give up? I think Susan Boyle’s sales were ninety-four, ninety-five percent physical, right? And that’s in a market where a lot of people don’t have CDs near them. So, there’s clearly still a demand, and we’re selling a lot CDs on television. We had a compilation that came out recently called The Edge that was the #4 record in the country. It sold over fifty-thousand copies just on television.

MR: What’s the reason for that?

CC: I think people are buying CDs on television partly because they can’t find them in stores. They’re seeing them on television, and where five years ago, they might have said, “I’m not going to do this,” because they would have known that they could get that record somewhere near them. Now, they’re seeing things on television and thinking, “Wow, I don’t know if I can get that in the store. I’d better order it here.” So, we’re actually selling more CDs on television than we have in a couple years. So, I just think it’s a mistake, there are ways of doing both of these things, and we’re going to try. And look, we’ve got an artist, Dave Barnes, who has a song that’s a hit and that’s going to sell a ton of downloads and a ton of tracks and that’s great.

MR: So, the death of the CD still might be a little further down the pike?

CC: There’s always a risk when you talk about there still being a CD market that you’ll look like the guy that was still clinging to the stagecoach when the trains came. But it’s actually not the case because this is still a very viable market, and more importantly, it’s consistent with the way a lot of consumers behave. So, if a lot of consumers are behaving this way, then you want to try to accommodate them and most companies aren’t, at least we’re trying to.

MR: And as a business, Razor & Tie has branched out in many ways.

CB: Well, I think what we’re trying to do is just be a viable music marketing company. We’re still very connected to music, we love music, and people still love music. A lot of this is just about how people are going to engage with music and how they’re going to pay for it. So, what we’ve done is, rather than just sell recorded music–which we did for years and years–we’re doing other things that tap into revenue streams that the music industry presents and allows us to work with artists and music projects on a number of different levels.

MR: Definitely, you have to be forward thinking to survive.

CB: And that’s really our solution to the change in the music environment. So, if we have project with an artist, maybe we’ll sign them to our music publishing company and that makes it easier for people who want to license that music to license it, because they can get it from one place, from us. And that makes a lot of sense for us, as well.

MR: A lot of Razor & Tie’s success also can be attributed to your bravely taking on unusual projects. Way back when, you took on country parody before it was popular with Cledus T. Judd. But you also took on other unusual projects.

2010-08-16-41666PAKRVL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CB: This is true. We’ve always taken on projects that other, larger companies would not think could be as successful as they actually were. We try to find things that we think there’s a real audience for, and then we try to back it up with the marketing that kind of connects to that audience.

MR: Over the years, you’ve especially done an incredible job with your TV marketing. In fact, you really were the television marketing force for over a decade.

CC: And we still are.

MR: And you still are.

CC: No, I’m serious, we still are. We still sell way more music than anyone else does on television, we’re getting hired for some of the biggest campaigns in the country, and yeah, that still is happening here.

MR: You branched out into DVDs a while back, and you’ve had some hits with notable rap releases.

CC: Darren’s Dance Grooves.

MR: Yes, and the one you made on…

2010-08-16-51YBGDVQZML._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CC: …oh, Biggie & Tupac.

MR: Yeah. That DVD was huge.

2010-08-16-51ffNR6BIZL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CC: Yeah, and we’re about to launch a big campaign with US magazine. We just did a venture with US for a fitness series, and the first one that’s going to come out is the lovely Kendra (Willkinson).

MR: Right, I interviewed the trainer, Nicky Hollander, for HuffPost.

CC: Well, that’s our video, and it’s going to come out next month. And it’s got nothing, really, to do with the music business, but it all has to do with our marketing and production chops. So, that’s another example, this series of fitness videos. Kendra’s the first one, and I think it’s going to be really successful.

MR: Who are some of the newer acts on the roster?

CB: We signed a band called The Summer Set out of Arizona, they’re really great songwriters. They’re young kids in their teens and early twenties, and they put on a really amazing show, a lot of energy. They’ve been building and developing fans all over the country. They were on the AP tour, and on the Warp tour all summer long. They couldn’t be better people to work with, they’re very enthusiastic, they’re very talented, they love what they do, they work every day, and it’s really fun to work with them. We just signed a band called, The Graduate who comes out of Maryland, and they’re a really interesting rock band. They’re another band that’s been touring around. They’ve developed a very interesting base, and they’re working on a record over the next year that I think that’s going to be very successful.

MR: Since you have Sony distribution, you’ve been able to set up deals with labels and artists that aren’t necessarily signed to Razor & Tie.

CB: That’s correct. All in all, A&R–which is “artist and repertoire,” the way record labels find bands–has always been left on the shoulders of one or two people in each music company, and it’s our view that that’s not really the right way to go. We have a great A&R staff here, and they bring us a lot of music to sell and release, but we also look to other people to do that. One of the ways is by distributing smaller record labels whose owners have a real vision for what kind of music they want to bring to the marketplace. Then, when we have success together, we try to ratchet it up and venture the project and put some more bucks behind it to help it build and grow.

2010-08-16-51qLvNG8IJL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CC: We’ve got relationships with all kinds of people now. We have distribution relationships that allowed us to amp up certain projects. For instance, we did a deal with a label called Prosthetic which had a band called All That Remains. We distributed them, and we were able to upstream them. We’ve now put out three records and each have sold two-hundred fifty thousand copies. They had the expertise in that kind of music, and we had the distribution and marketing capacity to really help them, so it was a win-win for everybody. And, we’ve been doing more and more of that. At the same time, we’ve become a bit more aggressive in terms of signing new artists like Dave Barnes and others who’ve had success.

MR: Plus you’re releasing cast albums with Ghostlight Records.

CC: Right, that’s another one of those distributive relationships we have which is great. We’ve got the cast recordings of In The Heights, Hair, Legally Blonde, and Next to Normal.

MR: You’ve created other kinds of relationships through your publishing company.

CC: We have a publishing company now that’s doing really well, and we’ve signed artists like Matisyahu and Drive-By Truckers.

MR: And there’s your media buying division.

2010-08-16-51ZPQ2QbWkL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CC: Our media buying company now buys a lot of media in addition to just for ourselves. We handled all the TV buying for the Michael Jackson This Is It soundtrack, the Sade album Soldier Of Love, and they were both #1s. We’re doing a lot more of those, so it’s another big area that we’re in. Basically, what we’ve found is that the major labels are really having a challenge in terms of adapting to this market, and most indie labels are niche-y or not particularly well-financed. We’re in a very good place, I think, because we’re this independent label that has major label distribution, is always on the charts, has a fully integrated marketing staff with physical, digital, publicity, radio, and everything else. We have the oomph to sell a lot of records, and at the same time, give the attention and personal focus that a small label can. And we don’t need to sell a million copies of something for it to be successful. So, we’re in a good place right now, I think, unless of course the whole music business blows up, you know?

MR: What’s Razor & Tie’s business model for the future?

CC: Well, I think our model for the future is associating with people who are, perhaps, more connected in a particular, passionate area of music. Prosthetic was that, Ghostlight was that. These guys are on the ground and engaged fully in those genres and in those scenes. We have the resources, and the expertise, and the know-how to help them bring that to a bigger audience, so when they have something that’s bigger, we can all benefit together. On some level, it’s almost an A&R play. It’s a distribution and a service thing, but when it really works, it’s All That Remains, and we have a big artist together.

MR: Do you have any particularly unusual business relationships set-up?

CC: We just did a new kind of deal with a really interesting company called The Artery Foundation. The Artery Foundation is a management company out of Sacramento, and they manage a lot of really successful, younger, harder bands that are not really very well-known to the mainstream, but have passionate followings, do great live business and sell a lot of records. So, they’ve managed The Devil Wears Prada, for instance, and the guy who runs this thing, Eric Rushing–who had always signed his artists to other labels–decided that he wanted to have his own label. This was actually brought to our attention by my son, Dylann, who, at the time, was fifteen. He said to me, “Eric Rushing has this company, The Artery Foundation, and they really want to have a record label. Razor & Tie should be his record label.” I said, “Well, I don’t really know much about those guys. Why don’t you call them?” Dylann called them, and basically ended up having a great relation with Eric that led us to having a deal with him where we’re now his label. So, it’s not a distribution deal, it’s a venture. Eric’s basically finding these bands–many that he manages–and they come out through Artery/Razor & Tie, the joint venture.

MR: So Eric Rushing, basically, oversees his acts?

CC: Eric signs his bands. His brand means a significant amount there, he puts them on tours, he kind of gets them started, and then we help him out. It’s our venture together. That’s an opportunity to tap into something that, I think, we would otherwise have a more difficult time tapping into. It’s another sort of win-win, and a way for us to leverage our expertise and our resources with somebody who is a legend in his world. In music, that’s changing more and more, what’s going on here is connecting to passionate but perhaps smaller scenes. People like Eric become more important, and the fact that we can be flexible enough to do Eric’s bands at the same time as we do the cast recording to Hair is really great, and that’s what we want to do. We don’t want to be so narrow that all we do is singer-songwriter or heavy music, or this or that. It doesn’t make sense.

2010-08-16-41IJLhUq08L._SL500_AA300_.jpg

MR: Dave Barnes is also a Razor & Tie success story.

CB: We just released his album a few weeks ago and we’re having a lot of success with him. He’s a great singer-songwriter out of Nashville, he has a very strong touring base. His career is going great, and this album is doing really well.

MR: And he’s benefited form still another Razor & Tie marketing approach.

CC: We’re trying to succeed on so many different levels without being stupid. I know that’s kind of a nutty thing to say, but he’s a good example. Dave Barnes is great, and he delivered his new record that debuted at #60 on Billboard’s album chart. There is a song on it called “God Gave Me You” which is not a religious song, but just a song about being thankful for his relationship and all those kinds of things.

We decided we’d start it in Christian radio, and it went Top 5 on Christian CHR, was the fastest rising song on the Christian AC chart, and we’re going to cross it over to the mainstream AC over the summer. It’s a great example of how flexible, or eclectic, or schizophrenic we are. He sang the song in a wedding scene on All My Children, and this song has the potential to be one of those standards that people play at sentimental events. It’s getting an amazing reaction. That’s a great development for us, and we can do that without having to wait for all the gatekeepers. We put it up online, did some pre-sale stuff, and sent it over to Christian radio. They loved it, and off we went. So, there’s ways of doing that now that I’m not sure would have been so easy to do twenty years ago. I think nearly every record label on the Christian chart right now is on a label that sort of has their foot in the Christian world though, obviously, we don’t. But, the song is successful because of the professional people working for us, and we all made it work. I’m very excited about that.

MR: Because of the success you’ve had with Dave Barnes, might you now be thinking, “Hmm, what else can we do in the Christian market?”

CB: Well, we’ve signed some rock bands who have a relationship with the Christian market. They’re not Christian acts per se, but they have a relationship there, and our publishing company has signed a few artists that write spiritual and other music. Most of them are out of Nashville, and they’re very successful writers. So, it’s something that we’re already involved in a little bit, and probably will be more.

CC: That’s one thing I think, honestly, we’ve learned from having success with Darren’s Dance Grooves and then doing four things right after it that weren’t successful which gave back a lot of the money. The Barnes song is a great song, I understand why it’s successful. It’s allowed us to learn a lot about that market and understand it a little bit more, but I’m not all of a sudden assuming that we’re now experts on this thing in any way. We’re learning about it and happy about it, but I also think we just have a song that really reacts, that we’re flexible and capable of figuring out how to bring that to the right people.

MR: At some point, most labels abandoned marketing to older demographics. Does Razor and Tie court that older demo?

CB: Sure. I mean, we have always signed a broad range of artists from young to old, different kinds of audiences. Cliff and I really just look for the music to be good and for the artist to have some fan base that we can sell and market their music to. So, we’re kind of agnostic, in a way, about what kind of artists we choose to sign. We just kind of have to like it, and that’s it.

CC: Sure, we embrace them all the time. Look, we put Neil Sedaka’s record out two years ago and did great. We did Joan Baez’s last studio record that got nominated for a Grammy and sold fifty-thousand copies. We co-produced a terrific documentary on Joan that we did in conjunction with PBS. And there are a lot of good ways of connecting to those folks. They’re very responsive, they’re actively on Amazon, they’re listening to NPR, some of them are watching QVC, and they respond to TV spots. That audience is actually an exciting one for us, and we’re interested in continuing to connect to established artists who have done great.

2010-08-16-519OoaFkuL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CB: Yeah, Cliff and I executive produced the documentary that was out on Joan last year on the American Masters series. We’re very supportive of Joan and she’s a great artist.

MR: When Joan gave me an interview for HuffPost, I was amazed at how intelligent she was, like off-the-chart smart.

CB: That must have been fun, right? She’s an interesting person.

MR: And now for the opposite demo. You sold millions of “Monster” collections, and you launched yet another series phenomenon with Kidz Bop.

2010-08-16-51SNDF9SR1L._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2010-08-16-51quMWhPzgL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

CC: We were able to create Kidz Bop for a relatively small amount of money, but we put a lot of work behind it. We started Kidz Bop in 2001 by just making a CD, running spots on television, getting orders, and off we went. Since then, we’ve gone on to sell, I think, 13 million CDs. It’s become the biggest kid’s music brand in the country, and we’re now ramping that up with a Wii game that’s coming out in the fall. There’s a national talent show–sort of a Kidz Bop meets American Idol–that’s going to launch this summer.

MR: And Kidz Bop’s success led to the creation of your children’s label, right?

CC: That expertise in the kid’s world has allowed us to have other kid’s opportunities, from signing Laurie Berkner–who is the biggest kid’s artist in the country–to releasing the soundtrack for the first Chipmunks movie record, and we’re about to do some other kid’s things. So, the kid’s market has been a very good one for us, and we’re going to keep working on that. Those people still buy CDs.

MR: What’s your prediction for Razor & Tie’s next ten years?

CC: Oh my God, are you kidding me? Ten years?

MR: Yup, ten years.

CC: Oy, gevalt

MR: Five years?

CC: …

MR: A year?

CB: A year, I can tell you. Hopefully, our business will still be going as strong after thirty years as it is after twenty. But hopefully, I’ll also be able to take in some sun and do a little fishing at the same time, we’ll see. In the next couple of years, I think it’s actually a time of opportunity for us. We’re one of the larger independently owned music companies in terms of markets here in the United States, and I think that gives us a lot of opportunity to sign talent that is no longer interested in being in the really large record companies. It’s already starting to happen, we’re about to sign an artist–I can’t tell you who it is–who is a really great talent, and is one of those artists that I think will be with us for a long time, coming here as a result of wanting to be at a place that’s vibrant and exciting and independently owned.

CC: I want us to continue to be a very diversified entertainment company that is very responsive to the changes in the marketplace, and at the same time, is successful on a larger scale, but can still do projects that Craig and I care about that are not necessarily going to be huge sellers. So, I know that’s kind of mushy, but ultimately, that’s kind of where we’re headed. I’d like to be the most successful independently owned music company in the country, and continue to maintain a vibe that is a little bit more personal, that allows us to do the things we want to do, but at the same time, is ambitious and growth-oriented…open to changes and new ideas. However the music business evolves, I want us to be situated in a place where we’re very successful.

MR: What is your advice for artists and bands starting careers in music right now?

CB: Well, interestingly, I often am talking to up-and-coming artists either through people I know or through people I know who know other people that want advice. So, I actually have a lot of opportunity to talk to younger artists that are trying to develop. What I tell them is to be willing to sacrifice, work hard, play, tour, and develop a fan base on their own, and not look to a record label or a publisher to bankroll their success. They’ve got to figure out their own way, and with all the tools that they have now to reach an audience–the distribution tools that they have now with the internet and satellite radio and internet radio and all these other opportunities–they really can start to develop a fan base for their music before they latch on to a company to help them market it. I think that, ultimately, labels like ours can be very, very helpful to those artists. But I think they have to figure out what it is and who it is that they are going to play to and develop as fans. From there, it really lends a lot of help and insight when they start a relationship with a label.

CC: If I had to say one thing, honestly, I would say that in this day and age, it’s more important to understand the connection between music and community. The value of a younger person in the business today really is about doing the kind of things we’ve been talking about–having access and an understanding of a scene that others may not have, and being able to live that scene and help it become a successful, potentially lucrative area of the business. The way the world is today with the Internet, there are so many different, smaller, yet significant scenes than when you and I were kids. I think that kind of flattens the world a bit, and it gives a younger person an opportunity to be really meaningful. I’ve got to tell you, Mike, my son Dylan has done great stuff for us. He’s sixteen now, a sophomore in high school, and he’s signed bands to us. He set up this Artery deal. I don’t think Dylan could have done that in 1978 because he would not have had access to all that information. So, that’s what Dylan does with us, and he is very much a 2010 kid who can work.

There’s so much clutter out there, so somebody who can cut through that and really have an understanding of a scene, music, what makes the community of people who support that music go, and how to communicate to those people…well, all that is very important. I think it’s tailor-made for younger people to be meaningful. At the same time, it’s not just about recorded music anymore. Obviously, that scene, that whole environment can be much broader, from record label, to manager, to touring, to digital, to whatever it might be. You just have to look at it from the way the music business is in 2010.

(transcribed by Ryan Gaffney)

Read more: The Graduate, Michael Jackson, The Devil Wears Prada, Warp Tour, All That Remains, Prosthetic Records, Cliff Chenfeld, The Heights, American Masters, Ghostlight Records, Sade, Joan Baez, Neil Sedaka, Rhino Entertainment, Biggie and Tupac, The Artery Foundation, Susan Boyle, All My Children, Arthur Alexander, Marshall Crenshaw, Graham Parker, Hair, Dar Williams, Michael Stanley, Amazon, The Partridge Family, Bobby Womack, Eric Rushing, Bobby Bare, Dave Barnes, Razor & Tie, Qvc, The Summer Set, Nicky Hollander, Slim Whitman, Kidz Bop, Craig Balsam, Rhino Records, The Chipmunks, Laurie Berkner, AP Tour, Darren's Dance Grooves, Kendra Willkinson, US Magazine, Legally Blonde, Justin Bieber, Drive-by Truckers, Entertainment News

Comments (0)

MJ Fans: This or That number two?

1) You Are My Life vs Speechless
2) Off The Wall vs Thriller (albums)
3) Smooth Criminal outfit vs Billie-Jean outfit
4) Bad outfit vs Black or White outfit
5) Why You Wanna Trip On Me? vs Can’t Let Her Get Away
6) Michael Jackson vs Janet Jackson
7) His smile vs the glow in his eyes
8) Gold pants vs taking his shirt off
9) Human Nature vs Heal The World
10) Kiss Michael for two seconds or hug him for 5 minutes
11) Dance with him on stage or Sing with him on stage
12) Heehee vs Shamone
13) Bad era vs Dangerous era
14) Invincible era vs Off The Wall erea
15) Short hair vs Long hair
Jordan D: No. You don’t seen happy with any of the answers/questions I give you. Be grateful for what you’ve got. kthnxbye

Comments (18)